Total Phosphorus | GOOD |
Total Nitrogen | GOOD |
Chlorophyll-a | GOOD |
Alkalinity | FAIR |
Dissolved Oxygen | GOOD |
Lakeshore Disturbance | FAIR |
Lakeshore Habitat | GOOD |
Shallow Water Habitat | GOOD |
Physical Complexity of Habitat | GOOD |
Watershed | Minimally Disturbed |
For more information about how lakes are scored, see:
Gauging
the health of Vermont Lakes: Results of the 2007 National Lake
Assessment
Assessments based on habitat indexes developed by EPA’s National Lake Assessment program.
Comparison of the average habitat characteristics of sites around NINEVAH with the average habitat characteritics at undeveloped and developed sites at other lakes in the state.
Disturbance components that make up the Lakeshore Disturbance score. ‘1.0’ indicates disturbance occurs in the immediate shoreline plot. ‘0.5’ indicates the disturbance occurs in an area proximal to, but not within, the immediate shoreline plot.
Station | Buildings | Park | Commercial | Docks | Crops | Pasture | Orchard | Lawn | Walls | Landfill | Roads | Powerlines |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
E | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
F | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
G | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
H | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
J | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
Comments: Met warden on lake. Wilderness community inc. Allows use of their beach, but no dogs, own island but don’t allow access on it. Could not find inlet 2 from lake, found it from road. Hence no observations of wher it comes into lake. GIS is slightly off, inlet closer to F&W access.
InletNo |
TP (ug/L) |
TN (mg/L) |
TCl (mg/L) |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 46.1 | 0.40 | NA |
2 | 36.4 | 0.18 | NA |
InletNo |
Conductivity uS/cm |
Turbidity NTU |
Temp C |
DO mg/L |
DO % |
pH |
Chla (ug/L) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 23.3 | NA | 25.22 | 5.33 | 68.9 | NA | NA |
2 | 88.7 | NA | 23.30 | 6.25 | 77.8 | NA | NA |
InletNo |
Sediment Depth (cm) |
Sediment Delta (sq meters) |
Algae %Cover |
---|---|---|---|
2 | NA | NA | NA |
1 | 70 | 0 | 40 |
InletNo | Plants %Cover |
Dominant Plant 1 |
Dominant Plant 2 |
Dominant Plant 3 |
---|---|---|---|---|
2 | NA | Nymphaea odorata ssp. Odorata | NA | NA |
1 | 80 | Brasenia schreberi | Sparganium sp. | Nuphar variegata |
Characteristic | Comment |
---|---|
Type | ARTIFICIAL |
Flow | NA |
Control Height (m) | 1.5 |
Comments | 1 board in the dam, place to rais water level 0.75m if wanted. Has gauge on it. |
Comments: Couple of spots with bouldered shore, but not extensive. Peaks visible but see ski area trails. Found chinese mystery snail at where inlet #2 is shown on GIS to come into lake. 2 samples taken. Did not see snail at any of the 10 PHAB sites, outlet and inlet #1. Found 6-7 snails present. Looks like a bloom of algae in the water column going on at sites A, B, C, D. But when sampling site B (windward end, don’t see greater concentration of it like would expect with bluegreen). Well distributed in water column. Lake sures have expressed concern over observations they have made of increased algae in lake. Part of prioritizing this lake for this survey was due to concerns Susan Warren was hearing.
Category | Score | Feature | Present |
---|---|---|---|
Wilderness Score | 0 | Beach | 0 |
Wilderness-Like Score | 0 | Ledge | 0 |
Bouldered Shore | 0 | ||
Vegetation | 1 | ||
Islands | 1 | ||
Steep Slopes | 0 | ||
Peaks | 0 | ||
Scenic Bottom | 0 | ||
Cliffs | 0 | ||
# Total Features | 2 |