Lake and Watershed
Index Site
Leaflet | Tiles © Esri — Source: Esri, i-cubed, USDA, USGS, AEX, GeoEye, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, UPR-EGP, and the GIS User Community
| Total Phosphorus | GOOD |
| Total Nitrogen | GOOD |
| Chlorophyll-a | GOOD |
| Alkalinity | GOOD |
| Dissolved Oxygen | GOOD |
| Lakeshore Disturbance | FAIR |
| Lakeshore Habitat | FAIR |
| Shallow Water Habitat | GOOD |
| Physical Complexity of Habitat | FAIR |
| Watershed | Minimally Disturbed |
For more information about how lakes are scored, see:
Gauging
the health of Vermont Lakes: Results of the 2007 National Lake
Assessment
Click here to view additional profiles for ECHO
(HUBDTN) | Click here to view Lake Score Card for ECHO (HUBDTN)
NOTE: Hover mouse over chart elements to to view data values
Condition Assessments
Total Phosphorus: GOOD
Total Nitrogen: GOOD
Chlorophyll-a: GOOD
Alkalinity: GOOD
Dissolved Oxygen: GOOD
Secchi Transparency
Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen, Chlorophyll-a
Total Phosphorus
Total Nitrogen
Conductivity
Chloride
pH
Calcium and Magnesium
Iron, Manganese and Aluminum
Dissolved Organic Carbon
intentionally blank
intentionally blank
Habitat Map
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
Leaflet | Tiles © Esri — Source: Esri, i-cubed, USDA, USGS, AEX, GeoEye, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, UPR-EGP, and the GIS User Community
Assessments based on habitat indexes developed by EPA’s National Lake Assessment program.
Comparison of the average habitat characteristics of sites around ECHO (HUBDTN) with the average habitat characteritics at undeveloped and developed sites at other lakes in the state.
Disturbance components that make up the Lakeshore Disturbance score. ‘1.0’ indicates disturbance occurs in the immediate shoreline plot. ‘0.5’ indicates the disturbance occurs in an area proximal to, but not within, the immediate shoreline plot.
| Station | Buildings | Park | Commercial | Docks | Crops | Pasture | Orchard | Lawn | Walls | Landfill | Roads | Powerlines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 0.5 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 | 0 |
| B | 0.5 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 |
| C | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 |
| D | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 |
| E | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 |
| F | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 |
| G | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 |
| H | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 |
| I | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 |
| J | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 |
Inlets Map
1
Leaflet | Tiles © Esri — Source: Esri, i-cubed, USDA, USGS, AEX, GeoEye, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, UPR-EGP, and the GIS User Community
Comments: @ north end of the lake. Plant EWM?
| InletNo |
TP (ug/L) |
TN (mg/L) |
TCl (mg/L) |
|---|---|---|---|
| InletNo |
Conductivity uS/cm |
Turbidity NTU |
Temp C |
DO mg/L |
DO % |
pH |
Chla (ug/L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| InletNo |
Sediment Depth (cm) |
Sediment Delta (sq meters) |
Algae %Cover |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 35 | 200 | 40 |
| InletNo | Plants %Cover |
Dominant Plant 1 |
Dominant Plant 2 |
Dominant Plant 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 100 | NA | NA | NA |
| Characteristic | Comment |
|---|---|
| Type | NATURAL |
| Flow | Slow meander |
| Control Height (m) | NA |
| Comments | NA |
ECHO (HUBDTN) Lake Protection Classification
Comments: NA
| Category | Score | Feature | Present |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wilderness Score | 0 | Beach | 0 |
| Wilderness-Like Score | 0 | Ledge | 0 |
| Bouldered Shore | 0 | ||
| Vegetation | 0 | ||
| Islands | 0 | ||
| Steep Slopes | 0 | ||
| Peaks | 0 | ||
| Scenic Bottom | 0 | ||
| Cliffs | 0 | ||
| # Total Features | 0 |